Journal of Medical Education
Author ORCID Identifier
Chih-Kai Hong: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-1789
Document Type
Innovation
Abstract
Background: The Ottawa Resident Observation Form for Nurses (O-RON) is increasingly used for workplace-based assessment, yet guidance on numerical scoring remains limited, potentially affecting interpretability and educational utility.
Objectives: To explore an innovative, practical approach to numerical scoring for O-RON that balances reliability, discrimination, and usability in clinical education.
Methods: Nine alternative scoring schemes were examined by varying the middle-category score between 1 and 9 while fixing extreme categories at 0 and 10. Thirteen nurses evaluated four first-year orthopaedic residents using the Chinese O-RON. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, criterion-related performance, and group discrimination were explored across scoring schemes.
Results: Higher middle-category scores were associated with improved reliability but reduced discrimination. An equal-interval scoring scheme (0–5–10) demonstrated a favorable balance across measurement properties while offering intuitive interpretation for clinical educators.
Conclusions: This innovation proposes a practical numerical scoring approach for nurse-based resident assessment that may enhance interpretability and educational usefulness, and warrants further investigation in larger, multi-institutional settings.
First Page
118
Last Page
124
Recommended Citation
Chen, Pei-Yu; Farn, Chui-Jia; Wu, Kuan-Wen; Wang, Ting-Ming; and Hong, Chih-Kai
(2026)
"A Practical Innovation in Scoring the Ottawa Resident Observation Form for Nurses (O-RON),"
Journal of Medical Education: Vol. 30:
Iss.
2, Article 8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.67010/1028-2424.2057
Available at:
https://jme.researchcommons.org/journal/vol30/iss2/8